Contribution, impact and reflections of the philosophy in administrative management. A documentary reflection

Authors

Keywords:

Philosophy; History; Administration; Administrative Management; Administrative Thinking.

Abstract

This article considers and it is proposed as a reflection with which it is intended to establish a relationship between the different schools and philosophical thoughts, and their impact on administrative science. Methodologically, it starts from a review over time of the literature related to the different postulates that are presented in the different philosophical schools over time, building a temporary conceptual framework and on which reflections are raised in the light of administrative, strategic and current manager. This historical tour of philosophy is structured from the different philosophical eras divided into four moments: ancient times, up to 430 d. c.; Medieval times, from 430 AD. C. until 1453; modern times, from 1453 to the second industrial revolution (1914) and contemporary times, from 1914 to today. In this way, the document reflects a thread of thought of the different positions and thoughts of representative authors according to the distribution described and immediately afterwards the reflection on the administrative elements that reflect this line of thought. Administration, therefore, has not had an unequivocal definition, but the philosophy and thought of great figures have provided it, throughout history, and the epistemological foundations allow it to contribute to becoming what it is today: a science. reflective, conceptual and practical.

Author Biographies

Jorge Armando García García, Fundación Universitaria María Cano

Doctorate student in Administration, Master in Human Talent Management, Master in Theology, Theologian, Philosopher. University administrator with more than 9 years of experience, university professor for more than 12 years. Postgraduate coordinator of the Faculty of Business Sciences (María Cano), Coordinator of the socio-humanistic area of ​​the same Institution. Member of the SUMAR research group in the management, administrative and human talent lines.

Juan Andrés Vélez Salamanca, Fundación Universitaria María Cano

Business administrator from the UPB University, Medellín Colombia. Master in Education and New Technologies from the UDIMA University of Madrid. Currently a PhD student in Management Administration at the Benito Juárez University of Mexico. Teacher with 17 years of experience in administrative and managerial areas, in training in the development of management competencies and skills and strategic thinking. Coach, consultant and facilitator in business thinking and management skills. Certification as a Coach with Cocrear Argentina and Escuela Eidhi. Certified as a GERZA group dynamics facilitator. Certified as a VIA Leadership Program Trainer. John Hanley PHD.

References

Arana, Juan (2014). The role of philosophy regarding the relationship between faith and science. Scientia et Fides 2(1), pp. 159-178. DOI 10.12775/SetF.2014.008.

Arredondo Trapero, F. G., De la Garza García, J., & Villa Castaño, L. E. (2015). Propuesta para el diseño de un código de ética empresarial basado en la ética kantiana. Cuadernos de Administración, 30(52), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.25100/cdea.v30i52.26

Asensi-Artiga, V., & Parra-Pujante, A. (2002). El método científico y la nueva filosofía de la ciencia. Anales de Documentación, 5, 9-19.

Assalone, E. (1970). La concepción hegeliana de la administración pública. Una sistematización de los aspectos principales del concepto de «estamento universal» (allgemeine Stand). Cuadernos de filosofía, 67-68, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.34096/cf.n67-68.5452

Ávalos Tenorio, G. (2010). Actualidad del concepto de Estado de Hegel. NUEVA ÉPOCA.

Bonilla Saus, J. (2006). Aproximación a la obra política de John Locke. Universidad ORT Uruguay. https://dspace.ort.edu.uy/bitstream/handle/20.500.11968/2817/documentodetrabajo23.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Briceño Linares, Y. (2010). La Escuela De Frankfurt Y El Concepto De Industria Cultural. Herramientas Y Claves De Lectura. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 16(3), 55-71.

Camacho, L. (2004). ¿Es Leibniz un precursor de la globalización?

Carpio, A. P. (2004). Una Introducción A Su Problemática. Glauco.

Carvajal, A. (1999). Etica y política en Leibniz 1 Parte. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 69-78.

Carvajal, P. (1999). Teoría Política Y Discurso Políico Barroco. Sobre Los Orígenes Del Liberalismo Clásico: J. Althusius, J. Locke, B. Spinoza. Una Interpretación. Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos, 21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-54551999002100013

Chiavenato, I. (2014). Introducción a la teoría general de la administración. McGraw-Hill.

Copleston, F. (1957). Una Historia de Filosofía. 288.

Coronado Padilla, J. A., & Lukomski Jurczynski, A. (2015). Escuelas filosóficas y científicas como referentes para pensar las escuelas de pensamiento de la Universidad de La Salle. 45.

Estevez, A.M. (2022). Los aportes de la Teoría Crítica al análisis de la Tecnocracia y las políticas Públicas. Estudios de Derecho, 79 (173), 273-307. 10.17533/udea.esde.v79n173a11

Fajardo, A. M. (2020). Idea de la filosofía en Hume y Husserl. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19936.51200

Fernández S., O., Cárdenas A., P. P., & Mesa, F. (2006, diciembre). Rene Descartes, un nuevo método y una nueva ciencia. cientia Et Technica, XII(32), 401-406.,

Galicia Osuna, D., & Monroy Baldí, M. E. (2016). La retórica y el discurso administrativo. Contaduría y administración, 61(3), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.06.003

López García, P. (2020). Corrientes antropológicas de la filosofía contemporánea. En Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ó. Dejuán Asenjo, C. González Carrasco, & J. M. Martí Sánchez (Eds.), Construir sobre roca. Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. https://doi.org/10.18239/atenea.2020.20.02

Lorenzano, P. (2002). Presentación de La concepción científica del mundo: El Círculo de Viena. 19(08).

Marcillo Balseca, J. C., Heredia Logroño, P. A., & Benitez Triviño, A. S. (2017). Escuela de Frankfurt: Teoría Crítica. Revista Publicando, 4(12). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236643876.pdf

Marcondes, D. (2000). Desfazendo mitos sobre a pragmática. ALCEU, 1(1), 38-46.

Moreno, B. (2022). Aplicación práctica de los objetivos empresariales y toma de decisiones. Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina.

Nubiola, J. (2011). Raíces pragmáticas de la filosofía analítica. Sapientia, 67(229-230). https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/4635

Padrón Martínez, C. L. (2017). The Mary Parker Follett Theory: A Forgotten Work? Gestión y Estrategia, 52, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/gye/2017n52/Padron

Pavón, D. N. (1976). La filosofía liberal de David Hume. Revista de estudios políticos, 31-80.

Prada Dussán, M. (2017). Crítica moral de Francis Bacon a la filosofía. Revista Folios, 30, 99. https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.30folios99.114

Puell Palacios, J. (2009). La Filosofía De La Administración De Peter Drucker. Gestión en el Tercer Milenio, 12(24), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.15381/gtm.v12i24.8890

Rodríguez, L. (2018). Legitimidad Y Legalidad: Una Mirada Desde La Filosofía Política Para La Administración Pública.

Sáenz Vergara, E. M. (2017). Philosophy and science guiding knowledge. Revista Academia & Derecho, 8(14), 169-182.

Severo Chumbita, J. (2014). Apropiación privada de la tierra y derechos políticos en la obra de John Locke. Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología en Historia de la Ideas, 7(0), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_INGE.2013.v7.44075

Villasana Arreguín, L. M., Hernández García, P., & Ramírez Flores, É. R. F. (2021). La gestión del conocimiento, pasado, presente y futuro. Una revisión de la literatura. Trascender, Contabilidad Y Gestión, 18, 53-78. https://doi.org/10.36791/tcg.v0i18.128

Zevallos Vera, M. (2014). Origen, necesidad y filosofía de la administración y las relaciones humanas. LEX, 10(10), 427. https://doi.org/10.21503/lex.v10i10.230

Downloads

Published

2023-12-18

How to Cite

García García, J. A., & Vélez Salamanca, J. A. (2023). Contribution, impact and reflections of the philosophy in administrative management. A documentary reflection. Scientific Journal Visión De Futuro, 28(1). Retrieved from https://visiondefuturo.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php/visiondefuturo/article/view/837

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 1 (2024): January / June

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Armando García García, Juan Andrés Vélez Salamanca


The works published in this magazine are under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 Argentina license.


Important: The author is the owner of the rights to exploit the contents of the article of his authorship.

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

Adapt — remix, transform and build from the material.


The licensor cannot revoke these liberties as long as you follow the terms of the license.

Under the following terms:

Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you or your use is endorsed by the licensor.

Non-Commercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others to make any use permitted by the license.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.