Methodological review of letter L calculation in gross geographic product of Chaco series 2004-2015

Authors

  • Alcira Patricia Soria Ojeda National University of the Northeast
  • Julieta Bermúdez National University of the Northeast

Keywords:

Gross Geographical Product; Public Administration; Calculation Methodology; Activity Classifier.

Abstract

In 2013, the base year change of the Chaco's Gross Geographical Product was made, taking place before the base change of the Gross Domestic Product. Therefore, the provincial modification was carried out without having the methodology proposed later by the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC) for the calculation of the national indicator. Consequently, this presentation is focused on the definition of methodological adjustments to improve the calculation of the letter L (Public administration and defense, and compulsory affiliation social security plans) of the Gross Geographical Product. The analysis of the current calculation is presented, comparing it with the methodology proposed by INDEC and the definitions of international organizations for the estimation of this sector of activity. Likewise, a comparison is made of the classifier currently used with the latest version of the one suggested by the United Nations.It is concluded that both methodologies do not present significant discrepancies, but recommendations are made to improve the estimates of the municipal level, the social security branch and the expenditure of the national administration corresponding to the Chaco; and to enrich the use of indexes. In turn, the comparison of the classifiers does not show significant changes, but justifies the need for updating.

Author Biographies

Alcira Patricia Soria Ojeda, National University of the Northeast

Esp. In University Teaching in Business and Social Sciences (UCES). Degree in Economics (UNNE). Titular Teacher at UCES headquarters Resistencia and Teaching Assistant at the FCE of the UNNE. Researcher Professor at the FCE of the UNNE in a project on regional statistics and Gross Geographic Product.

Julieta Bermúdez, National University of the Northeast

Bachelor's degree student in Economics, at the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the UNNE. Student attached to the research project "Towards the construction of updated regional statistics: revision and geographical allocation of the gross geographic product of the Chaco". His research interests include regional statistics and their methodology.

References

CEPAL (2009). Informe Final. Anexo 1. Resultados y Metodología de las Estimaciones del Producto Geográfico Bruto 1993/2008. Convenio CEPAL/ Gobierno de la Provincia del Chaco.

Dirección Provincial de Estadística (2018). Producto Bruto Geográfico Provincia de Buenos Aires (PBG-PBA). Informe Metodológico Base 2004. Subsecretaría de Política y Coordinación Económica. Ministerio de Economía. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Recuperadode:http://www.estadistica.ec.gba.gov.ar/dpe/images/METODOLOGIA_PBG_PBA_BASE_2004. Pdf

INDEC (2011) Clasificador Nacional de Actividades Económicas CLANAE 1997 Notas Metodológicas. Recuperado de: https://www.indec.gob.ar/micro_sitios/clanae/documentos/NOTAS_METODOLOGICAS_CLANAE-1997.pdf

INDEC (2011) Clasificador Nacional de Actividades Económicas – CLANAE 2010 Notas Metodológicas. Recuperado de: https://www.indec.gob.ar/micro_sitios/clanae/documentos/NOTAS_METODOLOGICAS_CLANAE-2010.pdf

INDEC (2016). Cuentas Nacionales. Metodología de Estimación. Base 2004 y series a precios constantes y corrientes. Recuperado de: https://www.indec.gov.ar/ftp/cuadros/economia/metodologia_21_cuentas_nacionales.pdf

Laveglia, F.H. (2006) Contribuciones para la Formulación de un Sistema de Cuentas Regionales. Recuperado de: http://www.eumed.net/libros-gratis/2006c/211/index.htm

Naciones Unidas. (2005).Clasificación Industrial Internacional Uniforme (CIIU) de todas las Actividades Económicas. (Informes Estadísticos - Serie M, n. 4, Rev. 3.1). Nueva York. Recuperado de: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev3_1s.pdf

Naciones Unidas, OCDE, Comisión Europea y otros. (2016). Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales 2008. Nueva York. Recuperado de:https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/sna2008spanish.pdf

Naciones Unidas. (2009).Clasificación Industrial Internacional Uniforme (CIIU) de todas las Actividades Económicas. (Informes Estadísticos - Serie M, n. 4, Rev. 4). Nueva York. Recuperado de: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4s.pdf

Séruzier, M (2003). Medir la economía de los países según el Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales.Naciones Unidas y CEPAL en coedición con Alfaomega colombiana S.A. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/1800/1/S3393S489_es.pdf

Published

2021-01-20

How to Cite

Soria Ojeda, A. P. ., & Bermúdez, J. . (2021). Methodological review of letter L calculation in gross geographic product of Chaco series 2004-2015. Scientific Journal Visión De Futuro, 25(1). Retrieved from https://visiondefuturo.fce.unam.edu.ar/index.php/visiondefuturo/article/view/470

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.