The evolution of corporate social responsibility through organizational theories
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility; Organization; Theory.Abstract
At the beginning of the XX century, one of the most interesting times for the organizational field originates, being recognized as the second industrial revolution, where there were a lot of advances and technological innovations. It should be noted that, within this stage, important contributions were generated, establishing in this way the most representative organizational theories in the business field. So, this research aims to make a theoretical reflection through an exhaustive literary review to identify how the CSR has been affected by various organizational theories over the years. In conclusion, the documents that are about the different organizational theories show that the greatest contributions were made during the XX century, at the time of industrialization. These contributions were mostly aimed at issues of production. Today's companies have to analyze each of the benefits that CSR can generate for their daily operation. The main barrier to this not being implemented is that most managers consider it more of an expense than a long-term investment. It is a more viable strategy towards the development of organizations, since it allows establishing a sustainable future outlook.References
Barney, J. (1991). Film Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108
Bertalanffy, L. (1989). Teoría General de los Sistemas; fundamentos, desarrollo, aplicaciones (Séptima ed.). México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Bolaños, R. (2011). El desarrollo organizacional como estrategia para la modernización en la administración pública. Revista Nacional de Administración, 2(1), 135-144. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4716395
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. United States, New York: Harper & Row.
Bueno, E. (1996). Organización de empresas: estructura, procesos y modelos (segunda edición). España, Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
Carnegie, A. (1906). The Gospel of Wealth. North American Review, 183(599), 526-537. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25105641?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility; Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. DOI: 10.4135/9781452243986.n1
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure; Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. United States, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.
Clark, J. M. (1916). The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility. Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 209-229. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/1819437?seq=11#metadata_info_tab_contents
Díez, E., Díez, F., & Vázquez, A. (2014). Antecedentes de la institucionalización en las organizaciones. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 15-38. DOI: 10.5295/cdg.130416ed
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
Evan, W. M. (1967). La Orbita de la Organización: Hacia una Teoría de las Relaciones Interorganizacionales. Argentina, Buenos Aires: OMEBA.
Fayol, H. (1987). Administración Industrial y General; Coordinación-Control-Previsión-Organización-Mando (Décimo cuarta ed.). Argentina, Buenos Aires: El Ateneo.
Gallardo, A. (2002). La Era de la incertidumbre, la organización y la teoría del caos. Administración y Organizaciones, 4(8), 63-76. Recuperado de https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/administracion-y-organizaciones/articulo/la-era-de-la-incertidumbre-la-organizacion-y-la-teoria-del-caos
Grupo de Investigación Expok. (2015). Estudio de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial en México. Recuperado de Expok: https://www.expoknews.com/estudio-sobre-responsabilidad-social-empresarial-en-mexico-expok-2015/
Ibarra, E., & Montaño, L. (1987). Mito y poder en las organizaciones; Un análisis crítico de la teoría de la organización (Segunda ed.). México, D.F.: Editorial Trillas.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1988). Administración en las organizaciones; enfoque de sistemas y de contingencias (Cuarta ed.). México, D.F.: McGraw-Hill.
Luhmann, N. (1997). Organización y decisión. Autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo (Primera ed.). Chile: Anthropos.
March, J. (1988). Decisions and Organizations. Basil Blackwell.
Martinez, J. (2004). Los conflictos ecológico-distributivos y los indicadores de sustentabilidad. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía y Ecológica, 1, 21-30.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Molina, H. (2000). El desarrollo organizacional como facilitador del cambio. Estudios Gerenciales, 16(77), 13-25. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-59232000000400001
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2018). Air pollution. Recuperado de: https://www.who.int/airpollution/en/
Pidal, M. J. (2009). La Teoría del Caos en las Organizaciones. Cuadernos Unimetanos, 18, 29-33. Recuperado de https// Dialnet-LaTeoriaDelCaosEnLasOrganizaciones-3998894%20(1).pdf
Pless, N. (2007). Understanding Responsible Leadership: Role Identity and Motivational Drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437-456. DOI: 10.1007/sl0551-007-9518-x
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137-145. Recuperado de https://hbr.org/1979/03/how-competitive-forces-shape-strategy
Porter, M. E. (1981). The Contributions of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609-620. DOI: 10.2307/257639
Provan, K. G. (1995). A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-33. DOI: 10.2307/2393698
Simon, H. (1947). El comportamiento administrativo; Estudio de los procesos de adopción de decisiones en la organización administrativa. México, D.F.: Aguilar.
Solís, A. (2015). 4 escándalos corporativos del 2015. Recuperado de https://www.forbes.com.mx/4-escandalos-corporativos-de-2015/
Taylor, F. W. (1983). Principios de la Administración Científica (Vigésima séptima al español ed.). México, D.F.: Herrero Hermanos, Sucs., S.A. México.
Thiétart, R. A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos Theory and Organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19-31. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.1.19
Vélez, E. (2011). Un recorrido hacia la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, 19(25), 55-74. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1513/151322413004.pdf
Weber, M. (1964). Economía y sociedad. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Zapata, J. C. (2007). Caracterización del desarrollo humano, el crecimiento y el desarrollo organizacional en ocho compañías prestadoras privadas de servicios en salud en la ciudad de Medellín. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, 15(8), 211-222. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=151320354006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 José Francisco Herrera Acosta, María del Carmen Vásquez Torres, Eneida Ochoa Avila
The works published in this magazine are under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 Argentina license.
Important: The author is the owner of the rights to exploit the contents of the article of his authorship.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform and build from the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these liberties as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you or your use is endorsed by the licensor.
Non-Commercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others to make any use permitted by the license.
